Ohio Right to Life's Dismemberment Abortion Ban clears Ohio Senate

Legislation to shield unborn babies from dismemberment


DATE: Wednesday, June 28, 2017     PHONE: 614-547-0099 ext. 304

COLUMBUS, Ohio--Today, Ohio Right to Life's Dismemberment Abortion Ban (S.B. 145) was overwhelmingly approved by the Ohio Senate, 24-9. The legislation, which is sponsored by Senators Matt Huffman (R-Lima) and Steve Wilson (R-Maineville), is being heralded by Ohio Right to Life as the next step in the national strategy to end abortion. The passage of the bill coincides with the 50th anniversary of Ohio Right to Life's founding. In more recent history, Ohio Right to Life has successfully advocated for the enactment of 18 pro-life laws. Since 2010, abortions have dropped 25 percent in Ohio, falling to a 39-year record-low in 2015.

“With as much as we've accomplished in the last six years, our dismemberment ban is arguably the most significant and groundbreaking legislation to date,” said Mike Gonidakis, president of Ohio Right to Life. “For the first time since the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban, we're advancing legislation that addresses the brute force of abortion head-on. Every year in Ohio, thousands of babies are brutally dismembered by the abortion industry, ripped limb from limb and extracted piece by piece. Ohio Right to Life applauds the Ohio Senate for taking us one giant step closer to adding this game-changing pro-life law to the record."

Dismemberment abortion, otherwise known as dilation and evacuation (D&E), is a procedure in which the abortionist first dilates the woman’s cervix and then uses steel instruments to dismember and extract the baby from the uterus. The D&E abortion procedure is usually performed between thirteen and twenty-four weeks LMP, when the baby is somewhere between the size of a lemon and a cantaloupe. In 2015, the Ohio Department of Health reported nearly 3,000 D&E abortions in the state of Ohio. 

The Dismemberment Abortion Ban is built in part on the precedent set in Gonzales v. Carhart (2007) which upheld the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban, scaling back the scope of Roe v. Wade. In the Court's opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court's swing-vote on abortion, indicated a willingness to consider the harms of dismemberment abortions. He described what occurs in a D&E abortion: “[F]riction causes the fetus to tear apart. For example, a leg might be ripped off the fetus...” He continued, "No one would dispute that for many, D&E is a procedure itself laden with the power to devalue human life."

“The brutality of dismemberment abortion has already been vetted and verified by the Supreme Court,” said Gonidakis. “If passed, this bill could set the stage for a winnable battle in the Supreme Court. If partial-birth abortion is gruesome enough to outlaw, why not dismemberment abortion? It's far past time that Ohio leaves the archaic confines of Roe v. Wade behind. Dismembering a human person is wrong, and it is a shame that we even have to debate that. We thank Senate President Obhof and bill sponsors Senators Matt Huffman and Steve Wilson for their leadership in passing this legislation."

The Ohio House is expected to take up the Dismemberment Abortion Ban in the fall when the legislature returns from summer recess. 

Ohio Right to Life asks its members to send a letter of support to their state representatives by using its Legislative Action Center at ohiolife.org. Click here to take action now.


Founded in 1967, Ohio Right to Life, with more than 45 chapters and local affiliates, is Ohio's oldest and largest grassroots pro-life organization. Recognized as the flagship of the pro-life movement in Ohio, ORTL works through legislation and education to promote and defend innocent human life from conception to natural death.


Showing 1 reaction

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Diana Weiss
    commented 2017-06-30 01:54:51 -0400
    I DO NOT agree with the Senator….. (This is a terrible bill). 💔
    While I find her story amazing and inspiring….
    This bill will not stop one baby from being killed. NOT ONE.
    Bills like this are flying through, state after state…
    Making it against the law to cut the baby into pieces while it is still in the Mother’s body….
    Now, if there was no law like this? What would that mean when Mom went into get an abortion?….
    Well, the abortionist, by law must perform the safest abortion for the Mother allowed by law.
    And, the safest abortion (for Mom), is when the child is cut up inside of her and taken out.
    Now, the Abortionist cannot harvest and sell the baby’s organs when that type of abortion is done… The organs get cut up and smashed. They are completely worthless 💵💵💵💵.
    Now, if the abortionist could take the baby out without cutting it up first? He could then harvest the very lucrative organs 💵💵💵💵.
    But, an abortion where the child is not cut up inside Mom, and instead is taken out with intact body parts is far more dangerous to Mom…
    So, Abortionist were often forced by law, to do the (safer) abortion, where they couldn’t harvest organs.
    The safer abortion, where the child is cut up into pieces inside of Mom will become illegal…..
    Now the abortionist will no longer be hindered by law to do the more dangerous abortions, where they can harvest intact organs.


Sign Up

Vote Pro-Life

The Guide

Save A Life


Human Life Protection Act

S.B. 123

Ohio Right To Life
65 E State Street, Suite 300
Columbus, Ohio 43215

[email protected]
(614) 547-0099
Copyright 2018